If you haven’t been in a K hole for the best couple days, you probably have heard about the AIG bonus scandal. There has been considerable outrage and rightly so. It is kinda funny though to see. I remember about a month ago, as Glenn Greenwald has noted, Republicans fought hard to make sure there were no bonus restrictions in the stimulus bill. The Obama Treasury fought to water down the restrictions proposed as well. Both parties are now among the most vocal critics of the bonuses.
But what actually angers me more than this hyprocrisy, are those “serious” observers in the media that are so insulated from populist rage that they actually are arguing that the bonuses are justified. Andrew Ross Sorkin wrote in the New York Times that not giving out the bonuses would end up hurting that taxpayers. He argues the “brainiacs” (his words) that literally destroyed the largest insurance company in the world, (the company who’s slogan was “the strength to be there”), those geniuses need to be there to:
So as unpalatable as it seems, taxpayers need to keep some of these brainiacs in their seats, if only to prevent them from turning against the company. In the end, we may actually be better off if they can figure out how to unwind these tricky investments.
Furthermore:
A.I.G. employees concocted complex derivatives that then wormed their way through the global financial system. If they leave — the buzz on Wall Street is that some have, and more are ready to — they might simply turn around and trade against A.I.G.’s book. Why not? They know how bad it is. They built it.
God, I don’t even know where to begin. These guys are not “braniacs”. They have no special powers. So take the first claim. Its bullshit. If they actually new the value of the bullshit derivates they created, the company wouldn’t have failed. The whole problem with AIG is that they DIDN’T know what they were insuring. That’s why they insured worthless shit. They failed at their jobs. They were proven INCOMPETENT. And I’m sorry but if these guys are getting millions up front anyway, what incentive do they have to help AIG? Oh that’s right, it was reported that 11 of the top 46 bonus recipients already left the company.
What this scandal really shows is human nature and the consequences of not fully nationalizing AIG.
Actually lets give an example:
Suppose my grandmother dies and leaves me a $165 million dollars. Now she really wants me to go to college and become a professional; doing something good for society. But she gives me the money up front without any restrictions in writing on what I have to do to get it. What am I likely to do? I would probably just not go to college and not help society.
But if she made going to college dependent on the money, then I would go to college.
So coming back to AIG, if you just hand money over to AIG without actually creating restrictions on what they have to do for it, they will just loot. Why not? There only human.
Which gets back to a main criticism of President Obama. I am sick of his lectures crying “shame on you” to Wall Street. If you really find their behavior despicable do something about it! Shit man all I can do is bitch because I’m NOT the President of the United States. You are! Fully nationalize now!